Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It has been argued that including charity work in schools’ curriculums as one of the mandatory parts of education brings about positive outcomes. I whole-heartedly support this notion and believe that such programs would have a significant impact on the younger generations’ future.
Firstly, inasmuch as high school students, these days, spend their time only on the activities that serve their personal interests, it is necessary to encourage them to take on responsibilities that impact other people as well. This way, they not only learn how to be responsible for other beings but also become familiar with the challenges that society faces. For instance, if they were in charge of the sanitation of a small neighborhood for a week, they would understand how hard it is to keep a public place clean. As a result, they would consider it a civic duty to help keep the environment clean. Therefore, I believe that such services will make the society a much better place.
Secondly, such educational programs, if done right, would create a feeling of satisfaction among students. In other words, having done a task successfully boosts self-esteem and improves people’s outlook on life. Many people who have done voluntary work assert that the feeling one gets after helping someone in need or doing a good deed is second to none. Hence, I believe that introducing students to charity work could help them feel fulfilled and consequently encourage them to make such activities a part of their habit.
In conclusion, making community service a requirement in high school education ensures that future generations will understand the true meaning of responsibility and contribution.
Here are some useful links: